Does the 3 Strikes Rule Violate the Eighth Amendment?

The 3 strikes rule is a law in the United States where a person convicted of two previous convictions on serious crimes will serve a life sentence if they are charged with the third offense of violence. It is a law that was enacted in 1994 so as to increase the punishment meted on people who are convicted of serious crimes more than twice. This can be said to be an antiviolence strategy that makes the punishments harsh to the convicted persons regardless of the Eighth Amendment. It is possible for one to apply for bail bonds if they are charged with the 3 strikes rule offense of sorts.

prisoner bail bonds

Some 28 states have some form of three-strikes laws enacted and in use.

What are some of the disadvantages of this rule to the offenders? Well, these are some of them:

  1. The rule makes it possible for the offenders to be sentenced for longer jail terms so that they can be kept away from the general public.
  2. The ability for one to receive a punishment other than life imprisonment is limited by this rule.
  3. Based on how serious previous crimes were, and the seriousness of the current crime, the offender can receive from 25 years to life imprisonment, with the possibility of parole.

The Eighth Amendment prohibits offenders from being given high bail, excessive fines, and unusual or torturous punishments. As such, many people may want to know if the 3 strikes rule is a violation of the Eighth Amendment. There are sentences that can be deemed unusual and cruel but for the 3 strikes rule, this is not the case because of the magnitude of the crimes that the offenders will have committed for them to be sentenced based on 3 strikes rule. All in all, one can always contact a licensed bail bondsman for them to be bailed out.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on Linkdin
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest